Well, I acknowledge that we may be wrong about some of the information concerning ONA. However, the message that we are trying to get across to the audience is that Nazism has nothing to do with Satanism. People should be aware of organizations that only use Satanism as a springboard to further a political agenda.Well, I acknowledge that we may be wrong about some of the information concerning ONA. However, the message that we are trying to get across to the audience is that Nazism has nothing to do with Satan...See more
"Well, I acknowledge that we may be wrong about some of the information concerning ONA. However, the message that we are trying to get across to the audience is that Nazism has nothing to do with Satanism. People should be aware of organizations that only use Satanism as a springboard to further a political agenda."
Non-troll answer. It can be satanic like Boyd Rice wore Nazi regalia or Crowley was the beast, and rubbed his blasphemy in the fear of normal folk. Actually believing in that shit is more slave ideology, but the transgressive qualities of Naziism today is like an open interracial relationship in 1950's Mississippi. Reprehensible. Taboo.
And it could all be just a glob of liver and blood dangling from a hook.
But as their press agent might say, "There is no such thing as bad publicity". They become more like the Crowley beast every time some japey bitch makes the news in their name."Well, I acknowledge that we may be wrong about some of the information concerning ONA. However, the message that we are trying to get across to the audience is that Nazism has nothing to do with...See more
So what if the O9A gets banned? I assure that will only increase its badass persona. The badasses of Satanism made criminals for their affiliation? I look forward to witnessing such endeavors working to drive away those drawn to O9A to begin with.
The UK crawling internet censorship and obsession with pedophiles to the point that every man who merely chats with a kid is considered a pedophile are truly pathetic. Moreover, it's turning a legal system into a cabaret where more or less imaginative stuff published online is enough to file an accusation of the most grievous crimes, including murder. No evidence is required, shit, you don't even have to find a body, the tabloid gossip will suffice.
Because let's not kid ourselves, it's just gossip. There is absolutely no evidence of the ONA being linked to the crimes described in those shitty newspapers. And while I don't really expect the press to diligently gather proofs for all the insane theories it posts, the reliance of legislation on fairy tales is dangerous. Because first it's them and later it will be you. You might find yourself convicted of a crime because... someone said you're guilty of a crime. You write something and the thought police will be after you for all the imaginary thought crimes you supposedly committed.
You take away citizens' freedom not at once because they will rebel, you take it away piece by piece, making it a gradual process until they get accustomed to the regime. I compare it to slowly boiling a frog. You don't put a frog in hot water because it will jump out. You boil it gradually raising the temperature until it's dead.The UK crawling internet censorship and obsession with pedophiles to the point that every man who merely chats with a kid is considered a pedophile are truly pathetic. Moreover, it's turning a legal s...See more
I am not Saying that I support the UK decision to ban ONA. Just trying to spread awareness that there are organizations out there trying to use the Satanic movement as a springboard to further an extremist agenda.
Nah, I'm not accusing you of being in favor of censorship. I was talking about Hope not Hate and all those leftist journalists and activists trying to criminalize the content they do not like or disagree with. There is a danger that they will not stop with the ONA. Later they will target other Satanists, then pagans, next will be unorthodox Christians and last everyone who dares to have a different worldview than that espoused by the government.Nah, I'm not accusing you of being in favor of censorship. I was talking about Hope not Hate and all those leftist journalists and activists trying to criminalize the content they do not like or disag...See more
Every movement has a NWO. The Muslims want an Islamic NWO. The Christians have Always pushed hard for a Christian world order. The same can be said for communism and every other political or religious movement.
The Wall
Non-troll answer. It can be satanic like Boyd Rice wore Nazi regalia or Crowley was the beast, and rubbed his blasphemy in the fear of normal folk. Actually believing in that shit is more slave ideology, but the transgressive qualities of Naziism today is like an open interracial relationship in 1950's Mississippi. Reprehensible. Taboo.
And it could all be just a glob of liver and blood dangling from a hook.
But as their press agent might say, "There is no such thing as bad publicity". They become more like the Crowley beast every time some japey bitch makes the news in their name."Well, I acknowledge that we may be wrong about some of the information concerning ONA. However, the message that we are trying to get across to the audience is that Nazism has nothing to do with...See more
Because let's not kid ourselves, it's just gossip. There is absolutely no evidence of the ONA being linked to the crimes described in those shitty newspapers. And while I don't really expect the press to diligently gather proofs for all the insane theories it posts, the reliance of legislation on fairy tales is dangerous. Because first it's them and later it will be you. You might find yourself convicted of a crime because... someone said you're guilty of a crime. You write something and the thought police will be after you for all the imaginary thought crimes you supposedly committed.
You take away citizens' freedom not at once because they will rebel, you take it away piece by piece, making it a gradual process until they get accustomed to the regime. I compare it to slowly boiling a frog. You don't put a frog in hot water because it will jump out. You boil it gradually raising the temperature until it's dead.The UK crawling internet censorship and obsession with pedophiles to the point that every man who merely chats with a kid is considered a pedophile are truly pathetic. Moreover, it's turning a legal s...See more