::What's wrong with failures?
::It's just proof you do not accept someone else's standards and expectations.
That all depends on whether you associate with Satanists so as to become a success.
Quotes from Padowan
::'Success' doesn't matter. It doesn't matter what goals you pursue
::if you ever pursue any. It doesn't matter if you keep changing
::your mind. It's your life.
::...Success is a personal, subjective standard. So is failure.
::They are both illusions....
That's illogical. Either they are illusions or they are subjective standards, or, as others have used conventional standards, they are general references to societal aims. It was obvious to me that the OP is talking about conventional societal standards and focussed on those who are very likely pursuing them and failing to reach them. Those people, it is posited, affiliate with Satanists in order that some success might rub off on them.
Quotes from Padowan
::The Satanic Sins represent things to avoid if you are to exemplify all
::that is laid out in the SB as guidelines for the Satanist. ...
The truly stupid cannot choose to exemplify that intelligence.
Quotes from Padowan
::...Calling them sins gives them relatability to the ones entrapped by
::old standards of belief.
It is itself enmired in the crap of Christian dualism, and therefore has either a moral significance or is being stupid alongside them.
Quotes from Padowan
::...you and I will realize when a refutation is sound ....
I cannot confirm this about you at this point. You think the debate will have winners, and you are "all about winning" so we are here for very different reasons and may have different standards in evaluating what is written. For some reason you view those with the last word as winners (persistence). I see that merely as an indicator of available time and interest.
Quotes from Padowan
::Stupidity will be revealed through a consistent and persistent choice to
::ignore logic and reason. ....
That's illogical if you're not talking about a moral selection. The truly stupid cannot make the choice to be intelligent.
Quotes from Padowan
::It's obvious you weren't speaking to me or referencing one point I have
::made regarding failure or stupidity or sins.
I was speaking to you in my immediate reply but not in the rest. I'm setting a different standard here for your benefit and based on your request. I'm doing my best with this awkward technology.
Quotes from troll
::/::Where morality enters into it ... surely the intention is to dissuade one's
::/::fellows from replicating particular behaviours.
Quotes from Padowan
::How do you "dissuade one's fellows" from particular behaviors{?}....
In this instance, it seems to me intended to describe behaviours which will cause those who are using the standard involved to treat those exhibiting the behaviours negatively, as by ostricizing or avoiding them. If they care to affiliate, and they have the capacity, then they'll avoid the behaviours or conditions.
Where stupidity is a condition, it cannot be avoided. Where it is an action taken by otherwise intelligent people ('being stupid'), then it is avoidable and affiliation based on whether someone does stupid things will be negotiated. You said something similar.