Which is why my personal relationship song will always be this.
Which is why my personal relationship song will always be this.
~ George Adamson
This quote applies in an esoteric sense to the individual who newly discovers LHP religion(s). They can look the look and talk the talk, but do they walk the walk?
- CM(not Canis Machina)
The random things I read about that I find vastly more interesting than demons and macabre identity tags.
Take that, Maryland legislature!
~ Aristotle
What is naturally unequal shouldn't be artificially bolstered. Doing such sets what nature judged to be equal as unequal. Unsetting natures balance is what tips the scale against humanity in its course of survival; brings extinction ever closer.
The problem here is in equating the artificial with the unnatural.
There is nothing truly unnatural occurring in existence. 'Artificial' is used as a relative term to indicate an alternative to a generally accepted standard.
- or -
I could say that all initial organisms and material constituents are natural, and therefore all derivatives, thus 'artificial' serves as the threshold pertinent to a degree of change, but not unnatural.
- and -
Terms like 'artificial intelligence' are misleading. Artificial sweetener creates the sensation of being sweet even although it is not sugar cane, so while it may be referred as artificial in being man-made, but not unnatural where unnatural would serve a greater implication than that occurring outside, or beyond the scope of natures' status quo.
- so -
Ultimately 'artificial' becomes nothing more than a term to indicate a similarity as well as a difference and probably best used to distinguish the inorganic from the organic, but the mistake would be in equating the artificial with the unnatural.
~ Me
Now I'm just trying to wrap my head around evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of an idea independent of any variables, when the variables themselves are what defines these strengths and weaknesses. Can these words have any meaning when taken in isolation? Why is it that I, or an idea is strong, or, weak? Just because I say so? The way I look? Perhaps attributes is preferable over variables, something, anything - like a Todd Rundgren album.
And furthermore, the time factor as well as the social acceptance associated with the ideas' strengths and weaknesses are in fact variables.
What he's trying to say is that to earnestly evaluate something, the time and social acceptance variables can't be present because it creates the flaw of logic. But the artsy attempt at wording is sloppy.
~ Alcaeus (611-580 BCE) [Scholiast on Sophocles]
"The wrath within ourselves is of our fundamental nature; therefore, last to be lost. Don't lose the fire within, by allowing those without, to water you down."
~ Me