The colonies were expensive to keep. They drained the countries that tried and fought to keep them. The world wars was a factor too. Next there were civil wars and rebellions in colonies.
You don't want to read, fine. Keep making a fool of yourself.
Sign In
The "Islamic" Problem | Forum
Tom Riddle
Jul 22 '21
And African colonies?
It's not about immigration itself. It's about islamic immigration. It's people with islamic beliefs that creates troubles in Europe because they are raised to see themselves as superior to others. How much do you know about Islam and islamic history? Africans from Christian African countries do not make troubles.
You don't want to read, fine. Keep making a fool of yourself.
I would be a fool if I wasted my time on reading irrelevant stuff just because you don't understand what the actual problem in Europe is...
The Forum post is edited by Tom Riddle Jul 22 '21
Anna
Jul 22 '21
For fuck's sake, I mean African colonies. Take for example Morocco, our Muslim friend's country. Whose colony was it? The dominant religion is...?
Tom Riddle
Jul 22 '21
For fuck's sake, I mean African colonies. Take for example Morocco, our Muslim friend's country. Whose colony was it? The dominant religion is...?
Yes and not all African colonies where islamic.
Tom Riddle
Jul 22 '21
Deceived obedience, unfortunately! :'(
How about you take your disgusting muslim faith and fuck out of here?
Satanist since more than a decade
Jul 22 '21
Explain the Crusades in that same context.The difference between Christianity and Islam as a main cause is that the 1st religion offers an ecumenical way of religious practice for all mankind rather than anything that may interfer in the process of peaceful guidance while the 2nd one pushes for violence and eradicating all forms of infidelity to God and Prophet (Aka the Messenger of the Lord) on the face of this globe, a religion that provides over than 50% chance of going straight to hell and putting the most hard conditions of going to the promised heaven and having fun with the 72 virgins there }:>
Reality is, Christianity has become weak. Its adherents spineless. Its teachings corrupted with degeneracy.
All else you mentioned is nothing more than social programming.
Satanist since more than a decade, I wasn't trying to figure out where Islamic civilization went, but rather, why it declined so precipitously. The only reason it's even a player nowadays is because it has oil, and no Western country can just take the oil because the other countries (in particular Russia and China) would go to war for their cut.Do not confuse religion with Culture.
Islamic civilization is a mouse sitting on a fish which the cats let it have and dole out because otherwise they'd have to fight each other over who gets the biggest portion.
As for individual Muslims, they think it's praiseworthy to blow themselves up. 'Nuff said.
The statement made is the same as saying that Christianity still has relevance because most Christian countries have Weapons of Mass Destruction. It is nonsensical.
Satanist since more than a decade
Jul 22 '21
That is one of its side-effects yes.
Certain practices are a result of local habits grown by reason of self-preservation.
Certain practices are a result of local habits grown by reason of self-preservation.
Other things have a higher calling. A spiritual side which transcends culture.
Universal truths and observations which have to do with the nature of the world and man itself.
Anna
Jul 22 '21
Deceived obedience, unfortunately! :'(
How about you take your disgusting muslim faith and fuck out of here?
Hilarious. You're the one who posts the most nonsense here and you tell the other guy to fuck off. He can be a Muslim but, at least, he doesn't litter the site with bullshit like you. Your arrogance is amazing. Now you assume the role of a moderator?
Not all African colonies were Islamic? So what? What's your damn point? You wrote that the colonization would solve the immigration crisis. I dropped you a link about how the whole process of colonization and then decolonization contributed to the immigration troubles we witnessed in the past and witness now and also how difficult and costly it was to maintain the colonies. Your answer was irrelevant gibberish. Your solutions have already been tried. You don't know because you're allergic to reading.
Tom Riddle
Jul 22 '21
You wrote that the colonization would solve the immigration crisis.
No I said the colonization would solve parts of the islamic problem. Terror organizations gets their benzine from wealthy oil sheiks who have huge influence over the West because of the reliance on oil but by making them into colonies again we will have control over that area and with the sheiks eliminated terror organization like ISIS cannot operates. It does not take all the problems because we still need to have death penalty in Europe to clean the societies from mess. A terrorist does not have to be a suicide bomber. It can also be a person who tries to stab Rasmus Paludan when he utilize his freedom of speech... People who threatens freedom of speech shall be exterminated and death penalty is a tool to that based on the concept of innocense before proven guilty.
The Forum post is edited by Tom Riddle Jul 22 '21
Anna
Jul 22 '21
Attempts to colonize Islamic countries would only escalate the conflict to the disadvantage of the West. This is what history shows. The colonies had to be given up due to constant revolts. It cost too much, not only money but also soldiers' lives. It's extremely draining to constantly try to put down radical movements. Unless one would decide to nuke the shit out of them, it would be the constant reign of bloody chaos. I mean, seriously, history has already tested your dumbshit proposals. I addressed earlier your non-point concerning death penalty so I won't be repeating myself.
Educate yourself, kid, if you slept during your history lessons.
The Forum post is edited by Anna Jul 22 '21
Dark Enlightenment
Jul 22 '21
Okay so I looked up this Ramussen Palidan dude or whatever and this is what the dude did.
Quran burningsEdit
He is like if the ACLU was on the right instead of the left in American reference. A lawyer defending rights to offend and cannabis..
But I gotta say, it's awesome that the Danish Kid picked this out. It demonstrates something very useful to explaining LHP.
It's not that he defends freedom of speach but HOW HE DEFENDS FREEDOM OF SPEECH. ACTION in opposition to the status quo.
Quran burningsEdit
In April 2019, Paludan held a demonstration in Viborg, which led to chaos when 100 people showed up. Three people were arrested and, in June 2019, a 24-year-old Syrian was sentenced to 60 days in jail for having thrown a rock at Paludan. He was also to be deported after the jail term and was banned from returning to Denmark for six years.[17]
In connection with a planned Quran burning in Malmö in August 2020, Paludan was banned from entering Sweden for two years,[18] but in October he was granted Swedish citizenship
The Forum post is edited by Dark Enlightenment Jul 22 '21
Tom Riddle
Jul 22 '21
Despite we may disagree with Paludan he do us all a favor because he shows what will happen to us if we do the same as him and he shows the current state of society. What I have noticed mostly is that many people don't follow the principle of freedom of speech as they complain about the politic using resources to protect. It's hypocrisy and it shows it's no longer the western world we know.
The Forum post is edited by Tom Riddle Jul 22 '21
Mod
Mod
Mod
Tom Riddle
Jul 22 '21
Tom, shut up
No Miss anti-freedom of speech...
The Forum post is edited by Tom Riddle Jul 22 '21
Mod