The "Islamic" Problem | Forum

What Europe needs to do is stop accepting immigrants from Muslim countries, since the majority of these immigrants don't want to assimilate culturally and don't want to contribute to the economy. As for the immigrants already accepted, they should be given the choice of contributing to the economy or dying of starvation. If they rise up in anger, they should be brutally put down. If they won't assimilate and won't participate economically, then they didn't come to Europe in good faith, and Europe owes them nothing.

Does my preceding paragraph express a patriarchic attitude?

If the Muslim countries object to their expatriates being treated with severity, they may tamp down the oil spigots, causing oil prices to rise. If that happens, the West should do what should have been done long ago: Make a deal with Russia whereby we kick the shit out of the Islamic pipsqueaks and then dole out the oil under the auspices of a global governing body.

Would that, also, be patriarchic?

Muslims should be divided on the world stage. 

The interests of the rich ones seem to be buying football teams and representing their dicks in tall buildings or absurd 400 foot yachts. And also worth mentioning, restricting immigration from poor Arab countries. 

I don't think they should count because the sheiks are all Arab Chryslers and Duponts. 

Europe is being overrun with Syrians, Jordanians, and Iraqis, not Muslims. It's the financial influx equivalent of Eritrean, Somali, and Sudanese.  What the fuck is a person who initially made 980/year gonna do? 

And I am sorry poor people were opportunistic and gave European cities a new refuge ghetto, but I think it's unfair to categorize all Muslims the same. 

The vastly larger issue is whether Syrian, Jordanian, and Iraqui immigrants should be accepted into European countries. I say no. No, because, by and large, they don't want to assimilate into European culture. No, because, by and large, they don't want to contribute to the economy. No, because, by and large, they don't like Jews, who are already in place, assimilated, and contributing. No, because they're fucking Muslims, which means they're religionists, and we don't need any more religionists. Why can't we find any immigrants who are fucking atheists?

  As for the fact that most of these immigrants are unskilled, so their economic options are limited - Many Mexican immigrants arrive (illegally) in the United States without highly marketable skills. The myth is that they go on welfare. The reality is that they work their asses off at any job they can get. Ask any American restaurant manager to identify the demographic of their hardest working subordinates. If Mexicans are in the mix, you can bet the manager will say the Mexicans work harder than everyone else. This is what Syrian, Jordanian, and Iraqi immigrants should do, but largely don't. They're parasites. They should be treated with the same degree of mercy that we afford to tapeworms.

Quote from Wolfie Tom, why would patriarchy immunize Europe against Islam? Also what is it that makes Muslim men weak?

A patriarchy allows only men to vote and raises boys to become tough, strong and aggressive men (with other word masculine). The fact that men in Europa are to weak because of their mentally castration it becomes easy for muslim men to dominate. Here is an example. https://www.document.no/...voldsmannens-fotter/ If the boy was raised in a patriarchy he would be more fearless and try to destroy that muslim guy. I believe killing in self-defense should be legal.

I believe Commission on Human Rights is outdated and should be modified so countries in Europa can have death penaltry for terrorism (which attacking freedom of speech also includes), attacking private ownership, treason and cheating with social help cause these are the primary key for the success, wealthiness and happiness in the western world. Death penalty is how we can eliminate those who posses a threat to our primary values in the West based on the ideal of innocent until prove guilty.

Death penalty will not stop the fanatics. You forget that many of the terrorist attacks were suicide attacks. You cannot threaten to take the lives of those who are already ready to die for their God and whatever insane beliefs they profess. A religious fanatic, especially of a Muslim type, doesn't give a shit about his earthly life. He's willing to sacrifice it for the cause, for something greater than him.

And take an average Westerner. Would he be willing to sacrifice his precious life for his country or whatever value he claims to cherish? He could take a risk and fight but only if he's paid enough. This is the difference between Europeans and Muslims. The former can't see past the end of their noses. Occasionally, they can cry crocodile tears for the miseries that befall their fellow humans in less fortunate places on earth while giving less than half a fuck about their families and local communities, not to mention something greater like their nation or that abstract collective called the European Union. The Muslims, on the other hand, were brought in more collective societies, where the individual interests are subordinated to the interests of the community. I'm not saying that collectivism is better but this is what explains these people's determination and fearlessness in the face of death or other potential consequences of their behavior. That also explains their unwillingness to assimilate. People, for whom tradition is something sacred, will not cut themselves off their roots.

Poor people tend to suck dry any economy they are part of. Poor societies are that on the global stage. 

Similarly The Sudanese genocide refugees had the same unemployment issues, same acclamation issues, same fertility issues.

Religion still takes a back seat to a lot of poor people at once.

For the question, "Why do the poor Asians, Eastern Europeans, Persians, and Central Americans all work?" I can only answer maybe it would be different if 2.5 million came in 6 months?

And that leads to a greater point about instinctual social ethos.

Maybe there is a natural honor behind artificial constructs. A proto-morality and innate self respect of the individual evident,  like acknowledgement of territory and claim. 

Even though welfare is easier, way more self serving, playing a victim card can be ultimately beneficial, and it is for millions of ghetto dole bludgers, it is still detestable to take without the honor of earning it for yourself for many people, even the  herd-idealistically unaffiliated. 

It reminds me of O9A and by extension white nationalism. 

In the original O9A MSS there was a lot about "The Satanic Qualities of noble contribution to society".  "Are you an honorable contributor?",  type stuff.  Largely in line with Germanic work ethic and the instinctual nature of kindred self-sufficiency.   Granted they added a bunch of shit about culling AIDS junkie scum or others that don't contribute, but you had the same basic premise of the darwinistic anti-social welfare state.  

One could conclude "nature's way" (which is personified by a total lack of social welfare handouts) is the furthest thing from  an EU countries Value Added Tax to begin with. 

 But all civilization is artificial and you get what your social constructs beget. 

I wonder where you're taking your information from and how you come to such silly conclusions. It doesn't make any sense. I guess your only reason for typing is... typing.

Quote from AnnaAs for the military intervention in the less civilized but oil-rich shitholes, we've seen that too.

Nah, it's his genius speaking.

I wonder why he doesn't start for elections. See, he has a solution for everything.

What your dumb ass forgot or is ignorant of is that most immigrants of non-European descent have come to the Western Europe from the former colonies. So how can the cause of the problem become its solution?

Next, there are so many Muslim immigrants here that any aggressive methods would escalate the conflict and cause civil unrest, if not total chaos. Perhaps, it would make some ONA peeps happy but I doubt an average European would rejoice at the ensuing havoc.

Migration from the Colonies to Western Europe since 1800

And what nonsense? Your nonsense? Each time you write something, it's total bullshit. You don't check your information at all. You know nothing and can't even be bothered to read before you post.

Quote from Anna No need to hurry, slow-thinking kid.