The "Islamic" Problem | Forum

To paraphrase a famous saying: "The first rule of human sacrifices is: You do not talk about human sacrifices."

Pontificate, Magus of Prentention.

What would you have done differently than LaVey in codifying Satanism to sift out the posers? 

Like the Might Is Right paraphrasing in the "The Book of Satan"  section is contentious, what would you do with the more obvious instances of influence and homage? Especially in the first half. 

Bottom line, if you picked one part to focus on to get people to understand Satanism, what would it be? 

Book of Lucifer is ok but the only problem is that there is to much "in oppose to..." thing, meaning that LaVey makes Satanism dependent on Christianity. I would talk about things in society from a satanic perspective without giving shit about Christianity and I would not make claim that reincarnation believers all believe they were something great in past life nor would I say that there is only carnal because that's a claim and has nothing to do with Satanism. Just because the Satanist's primary interest is carnal pleasures does not necessary mean he rejects the existence of a possible spiritual reality because then he would just be like the believers...

I encourage you to do more.  Codify it like other posters do with their blogs and videos.  You want to be considered a knowledable contributor become a knowledgeable contributor. 

I want your version like "your peers" are putting forth. I have my own version, and a contested one at that, but I'll still throw mine out there first.

Do a post or blog with your intro to immediately get to the bullet point of your satanism. 

Something like: 

In Western Civilization there is a ubiquitous characteristic of its inhabitants that exposes itself during adversity.  It is the ultimate litmus test of wiring. One that will only become clear when you have seemingly nothing to turn to or nothing to lose. It looks up to the heavens and turns to faith... or cannot do anything approaching that. 

So where are you? You living phenomenally or too far in the land of ideas, idols, archetypes, psychodramas, and aesthetics to live without artificial confidence or fend for your will in real time? You need a guidebook? A map for the terrain you'll have to tread through anyway? It's an apprehension that tests epistemology at its foundation.

 It's the anarchism on the spectrum of social conscience, duty. It's the solitude on the spectrum of social dependence. And it's the rationalwiki on the spectrum of social superstition and fear. 

It would continue on as such. 

The funniest thing about it is that they have to put a lot of effort into appearing as a joke. You, on the other hand, don't have to do anything to look and sound like a joke. It comes naturally to you. While all the resident trolls have to work hard to put up a reality internet show, you just begin to type and everyone has free tech lulz. I mean your clownery is a piece of art because it's spontaneous and effortless. How are you doing this? I guess you must be really gifted. And shit you didn't even finish an elementary school. What does that say about all the clowns who have a university degree?

Please try to outsmart the circus worker, Mr LaVey, by codifying your version of Satanism. The audience is waiting.

I can serve as your altar. I swear I have no tattoos but you can check. Not sure if I could make your vodoo rooster do "cock-a-doodle-doo" but since you're not really into sex, it doesn't matter. We will write a new Satanic Bible together. It will be a masterpiece.

No, his church is The MGTOW variation and has no use for live nude altars and other excuses to see a bunch of naked chicks like CoS and Game of Thrones.

So he obviously wouldn't be after something like this: 

And if he was going to pose for such a photo he'd have to get multiple sex dolls and position them with fishing line. 

Then write a book. You have mentioned the issue before, so some of us hope that you write a book. Are you all about action or bull shit? Aquino, Jason King, have all written books of their own views surrounding Satanism. I encourage you to start writing something down, if you really want to "codify Satanism."

What do you exactly mean by "pseudo-Satanists?" I bet you're implying those who have stepped out of Satanism and evolved from there by creating successful organizations that does a lot better than the current COS. That is what the Left Hand Path should be all about "Self directed-self evolution." But you probably do not accept that statement, instead you play along by trying to show off your sophistication on the forums, while most of us already know you.

I do like the chicks on the picture.

Please explain the why to us in your own words.

Quote from AlexTheTerriblethere by creating successful organizations that does a lot better than the current COS. That is what the Left Hand Path should be all about "Self directed-self evolution." But you probably do not accept that statement, instead you play along by trying to show off your sophistication on the forums, while most of us already know you.