Liberal censorship | Forum

Topic location: Forum home » Culture » Current Events
Anna
Anna Feb 28 '23
Even James Bond has gone woke.


James Bond Novels Edited to Remove Racist Content


What's next?

Share:
Dantalion
Dantalion Feb 28 '23
I heard that they want to make the next James Bond a black guy or a woman. That would be disaster. If they’re smart, they would make Tom Ellis the next James Bond.
Anna
Anna Feb 28 '23
Anne Boleyn was played by the black actress too. It's just stupid. Was Anne Boleyn black? Fuck historical accuracy.
Cornelius Coburn
Cornelius Coburn Mar 1 '23
I used to watch James Bond a long time ago. Many preferred Sean Connery, but I think maybe Roger Moore was a close tie for first. I used to watch The Saint series with Roger Moore on a regular basis at around the same time also.


I think a disclaimer should be sufficient, but they're just not happy unless they are shoving their woke/politically correct shit down everyone elses' throats as well - attention whores.

The Forum post is edited by Cornelius Coburn Mar 1 '23
Cornelius Coburn
Cornelius Coburn Mar 1 '23
The boom in social media seems to be a big influencer here on some levels. They want to create a big stink so they can make that fuckin' video and upload it to YouTube. The sovereign citizens and their "right to travel" is another good one; I'd say done primarily for the video footage. I think the cops should spend a lot less time on these people. There seems to be no reasoning with them and their bogus YouTube acquired law. I just watch for the entertainment of seeing them get their windows smashed and/or being hauled off to jail. Many of them never learn, but instead just define the definition of insanity by doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result.
The Forum post is edited by Cornelius Coburn Mar 1 '23
Dantalion
Dantalion Mar 3 '23
@Cornelius Coburn<br />
I kind of dig the concept of a sovereign citizen as a Satanic concept, but I get bummed when I really think about it because in practice it can’t be done unless you’re a hermit living in the mountains that is completely self sufficient using primitive methods. Other than that we all have to depend on each other to literally survive, and you have to have government to keep the mess of humanity working in unison together. But the concept of being completely independent from government sounds soooooo appealing to me.
The Forum post is edited by Dantalion Mar 3 '23
Cornelius Coburn
Cornelius Coburn Mar 3 '23
I think a sovereigns' right to travel by car is fine, but if you're going to travel on city/state roads then you're going to have to follow the same rules as everyone else. You're either on the grid or off, as the Unibomber once said (paraphrased) "You can't eat your cake and have it too."
Dark Enlightenment
Dark Enlightenment Mar 3 '23

A really hilarious 2024 election. 


And so long Nigger Jim. All your satire has been consigned to flame in the stupid ages. 


The woke is getting pushed on more it tries to assert itself. 


All the woke politicians are failing and playing victim cards when they fail, and a troubling number of them are getting caught with a lot of kiddie porn (see College Park, MD mayor) so it seriously has validated the statement:


 "GAY PEOPLE ARE BRAINWASHING CHILDREN TO BE SEXUAL DEVIANTS AND SHOULD BE CONSIDERED A FORM OF PEDOPHILIC GROOMING"


HOLY WAR!!!

HOLY WAR!!!

HOLY WAR!!!


Woke = liberal gay depopulation agenda brainwashing, and that is all that matters. 




The Forum post is edited by Dark Enlightenment Mar 3 '23
Anna
Anna Mar 5 '23
Clearly, the remedy for woke censorship is republican censorship. Florida looks like the paradise for freedom lovers.


FLORIDA BOOK BANS: WHY ARE THERE EMPTY SHELVES IN FLORIDA SCHOOLS?


Florida bill would force bloggers writing about DeSantis to register

Dark Enlightenment
Dark Enlightenment Mar 6 '23

That's not paid attention to.


As long as Little Timmy can't read about Bobby and Tommy's "Adventures Behind The Toolshed" anymore. 


Graphic depictions of school boys sucking some underage cock are in those books, which was pushed by the woke agenda First. So it's retaliatory. 


That's gonna win republicans the presidency. America decided tranny assemblies at school, LGBT kids books, and pronouns are a loss of Christian values and see Conservatism as "protector of youth" for that. Plus censorship is okay if they are under 18. 


Mark this prediction: The Republican ticket will be one of the following combinations: Trump/Lake, Trump/DeSantis, or DeSantis/Lake. 


And then Fenrir wil devour the sun.

The Forum post is edited by Dark Enlightenment Mar 7 '23
Cornelius Coburn
Cornelius Coburn Mar 6 '23
Those town council members don't seem to like it much when parents take the podium and start going over some of the shit that's in those books. It's pretty bad I guess - YouTube censorship worthy.
Dark Enlightenment
Dark Enlightenment Mar 6 '23
This is going to be great. I knew all this woke shit was going to make people freak out, but the response to go after trannies is hilarious. Laws upon laws prohibiting surgeries on minors, abolitions of gender identity education. Just crossed the line going too PC. Wanting everyone to think all progressive like or else. 


And the more they try to make the safe space, the more religiously pissed people are getting. 


All because they tried to force everyone to hold hands and skip through the tolerance forest. 


The biggest concern is making sure schools get to kids before their parents can pass on their horrible fear of annoying homosexuals. 

The Forum post is edited by Dark Enlightenment Mar 6 '23
Cornelius Coburn
Cornelius Coburn Mar 7 '23

Woke/GBLT Agenda


I don't really know what the fuck it is, seeding, grooming? But the elementary school library content has definitely gone through some changes since I was a kid, and it's not just a video or two here and there. The YouTube algorithm recommends this type of content on a regular basis.


Not that it was ever really any great secret anyways, as kids, if there was ever anything to be known, we knew it, and we would talk about it and joke about it. It's just that nowadays there's some attempt to push all that 'esoteric' shit into the 'exoteric' mainstream which basically has similar effect if way back when we started talking about all our dark, unlawful dirty little secrets with our parents.


Some things are just better left compartmentalized, oil and water are never going to mix well no matter how hard you try, but some men can use the womens' restrooms for now - the equivalent of water mixable oils I guess.



Dark Enlightenment
Dark Enlightenment Mar 7 '23

Some call it grooming, I think majority ideals do this no matter who it is. In the 50's it was a steady diet of white supremacy. That can't really be disputed. They were indoctrinated as Norman Rockwell nuclear families chosen to oppose communism with WASP ideology. 


Now that the left has enough of a consensus they are trying to undo the damage they feel Americana did. So instead of Plymouth Rock, Manifest destiny, home ec/shop, they get white oppression of black people, historical atonement, and workshops on political correctness.  


The former doesn't like the their kids coming home thinking they are whatever because they just went through their introduction course on Gender Identity. Kids will want to be anything you make cool. The stigma being forcefully eroded has had an inverse reaction. 


This new type of social conditioning is going to lead to the furthest right Republican ticket people have ever seen.


I guess they overdid the rainbow shit. It's a kicking and screaming type of social change. 

The Forum post is edited by Dark Enlightenment Mar 7 '23
Cornelius Coburn
Cornelius Coburn Mar 7 '23

Oppression does appear to discern somewhat of a pattern that can be observed on some levels. It forms and remains stable for some time but then opposition to such oppression slowly begins to garner momentum and the ultimate effect is anything but opposite and equal, but instead eventually goes supercritical and the result can be witnessed as an irrational chain-reacting mental Armageddon. The social equivalent of "we're goin' down in a spiral to the ground". All empiricism to the wayside, if it doesn't aid our agenda then we'll just ignore it, and to a large extent it has actually worked.


Oppression of race erupted into a black actor for every role under the sun, now everything is racism, and culminating into BLM for one. Maybe it deteriorated some but more into the shadows than gone away, hell, I even get criticized for being racist in my own home but only in observation of ignorantly immoral scum where actions speak louder than color.


Basically, the same goes for LGBT with blatant disregard for biological facts and creating some turmoil with sports and the Olympics since it should be a well-known fact that men are naturally stronger than women. It seems to boil down to 'We're on a roll, let's see how much we can get away with!!'. Where in reality if you're born with a dick then you're a man regardless any amount of former social injustice - it should be as simple as it is obvious. Instead, the amount of unreasonable behavior must be proportionate to some inner fashioned amount of butthurt or something to the effect.


There is no square root of a negative number, it's just an (i)maginary unit tantamount to other declarations herein attempting to be imposed in a world of the objective. I'm all for subjectivity though when given a proper context.

Anna
Anna Mar 8 '23
Personally, I have nothing against LGBT or transgender people. They should have the same rights as the rest of the society. What I have an issue with is any kind of censorship. I'm all for freedom of speech and that includes the right to criticize, to dissent. However, the First Amendment, if I understand it correctly, gives the private platforms the right to censor the content they deem inappropriate or objectionable. So the constitution protects the citizens from censorship, but that which could be imposed by the government.


The assumption here is that the individual who believes some platform violates his freedom of expression can find another one or set up his own; that people can vote with their feet which platform survives and which goes down. It's a very superficial reasoning because a small forum or social network run by amateurs can't match the tech giants like Facebook or YouTube. I won't mention Twitter because Musk will probably kill it before summer vacation.


No matter how much this private censorship sucks, I don't really fancy the government interfering with it. There were some attempts in my country to introduce legislation that would let the right wing politicians and activists sue the tech companies for banning accounts and censoring the content. The idea seemed to be legit but the laws were so vague they could lead to even more censorship so they were voted down in the parliament.


Usually if the government officials talk about passing the laws in order to protect the freedom of speech or safety of kids, there's the undercover agenda to control public discourse. It almost always backfires on those who support it hoping for more freedom.

Cornelius Coburn
Cornelius Coburn Mar 8 '23

The amount of censoring is likely proportionate to the amount of momentum any platform is accumulating. Garnering mainstream momentum will incur more (and more general) forms of censorship, and I suppose there are censoring organizations that actively seek out censoring of those collectively on the radar to force an agenda.


Freedom of speech allows for profanity in some cases but nothing too terribly obscene, and ultimately every platform has its own nanny squad to filter accordingly satisfying their own agendas. Not all filters are appropriate for everyone, and I've dumped a couple sites because of it.

Cornelius Coburn
Cornelius Coburn Mar 9 '23

Lots of twisting and turning to produce all these exotic forms of censorship, and while I'm not racially censored on social platforms the same cannot be said of my dwelling. While the thread is initially about liberal/racial censoring my experience isn't quite that specific.


With your typical social platforms you have your general run-of-the-mill censoring involving profanity, obscenity, and hostility - what I'm most familiar with. I told an Admin once to go fuck themselves when they butted in on an argument me and a close girlfriend were having, although oddly enough there was no censoring but just a warning.


And then you have your theological agenda panel on another site censoring the word "it" in reference to God as if 'it' cannot be used without the stigma in absence of 'he' or 'she'. It's not intended to be derogatory, but if it's not 'he' or 'she', then it's 'it'.

Anna
Anna Mar 10 '23
Not all venues welcome drama so I can understand no obscenities or no hostility policy. Sometimes, arguments become personal and it's not always tolerated. But the worst kind of censorship is banning people for the dissenting views, even if expressed politely, or deleting the posts deemed as "misinformation." What I find hilarious are Facebook "independent fact checkers." I guess the cattle has to be told by their masters what the Truth is. God forbid if they searched for it themselves.
Dark Enlightenment
Dark Enlightenment Mar 10 '23

Honestly, Musk buying Twitter and joining team "Fuck the Woke" was something that needed to happen. Fact Checking had become a bias liberal concensus pimping joke. A quasifascist snowflake appeasing safe-space.


It SCREAMED to be shit on by Eris.


Something you need to realize about America. We're WAAAAYYY more religious than most of Europe. 


Our GOP response to Biden's State of the Union was given be Jesus Magee Huckabee and was essentially a Christian battle cry against anything Woke. Too many trannies danced for children and every creepy thing liberals did was noted and helped sew the seed of Holy War.


And now it's creepy LGBT people and their perverted indoctrination of society vs the righteous sanctity of Christianity. The main accelerant no one can deny. The homophobic worm within Abrahamic religion (except Jews) and PC worm in liberals are going get removed spitting venom into the host.   


Going to be the shit show everyone deserves.

The Forum post is edited by Dark Enlightenment Mar 11 '23
Pages: 1 2 »
Satanic International Network was created by Zach Black in 2009.
Certain features and pages can only be viewed by registered users.

Join Now

Spread the Word. Help Us Grow

Share:

Donate - PayPal