New member here :) | Forum

Welcome.

If this is what you believe, then you're in for not very nice surprise.

And since you've been already doxxed once, I would suggest more caution. Although the moderator here is a nice lady who will keep your info confidential, every social network attracts its fair share of trolls, scammers, stalkers and all kinds of crazy people who might pose as your friends but later turn out to be total cuckoos.

If you're not comfortable with sharing something in public, don't share it in "private" either.

But above all, enjoy yourself here. Blogs are a little bit buggy so it's better to post in the forums if some discussions interest you. 

I will make sure that I will enjoy myself here and I will be very careful when sharing information, especially in private, as you have said.

I was wondering where I know you from. And then I recalled you posted frequently on truth4satan forum, which I took a peek at a few times. You seem to be a decent and sensible poster, albeit a lil bit theistically inclined. It's a rather atheistic board but I'm a Christian and have been here for... oh dear eleven years. Guess it's addiction along with the morning coffee.

This has long been an issue for me. You have the metaphorical "black and white" as it pertains to theology where you either believe in God or you don't, but the uncertainty of such labels arises as you consider deviant versions/definitions of such a being, or, 'thing'.

The typical "God" of the masses I presume would be of the type referred in the Bible, or, a 'personal' type god, and if you don't care for the anthropomorphic qualities you might even consider yourself an atheist for lack of a better term, and then eventually you come to recognize a third flavor being that of deist; maybe it's not perfect but the flavor more appealing.

I've even heard CM refer the "antitheist" in the past which is an even newer one for me, anyway, my original intent here was to ask Anna how she would strictly define the primary two and possibly a third that reconciles any remainder, maybe it's a bit much, I don't know. Sure, I could just Google it; have before, and some of this would be a result of that, but this particular post is Google free.

I've heard something similar to this decades ago, although the reasoning behind it may have been/was probably different. Some of Nietzsches' philosophy could be applied in arriving at such a notion via my own devices and this too likely an alternate version.

One scenario is that anything that exists now exists periodically throughout eternity, but it's not something I currently perceive as one having any control over, and if you contemplate an alternate (as a possible) true nature of identity it begins to undermine all of it to an extent where the proposition/conclusion needs to be reworked a bit.

- never go see Dr. Acula

Didn't know you were here for eleven years, this surely approves the theory that it is quite a good addiction that you are here.

I was a frequent and decent poster on truth4satan, I always managed to get my info while also crediting the source, were applicable, such as the blog from the druidry.org website.

I respect copyright and I think it is important to credit authors and their works when needed to do so.