Polyamorous relationships | Forum
And no monogamy is not lack of self-love. That's a feminist lie. That kind of relationship is natural as it's ensure the offsprings are raised healthy to function as civilized rational people.
Non-virgin answer:
It does take a lack of possessive jealousy.
It's also wired in our genome to be promiscuous and bisexual. Look at chimps in captivity. There are breeding pairs, yes, but every chimp FUCKS every other chimp, even ones in an existing breeding pair. Dolphins are notoriously sex crazed and bisexual as well. They'll even try to fuck humans.
The unnatural thing was what put the Bacchanalian public sex baths to bed. Many early pagan cultures were ALL polyamorous. Polytheistic = Polyamorous (except in Asia). When the divinity streamlined into a single man the ideas that followed streamlined into JC coveteth patriarchy.
And outside of homosexual polyamorous ones it takes a degree of transgender proclivity of "the odd sex out" to pull off.
E.g. The girl with guys (very rare) has to like wearing a strap-on, and the guy with girls had to like being cockholded and giving oral sex. (Most of the men in question are attracted to the woman's preference for other women over themselves and much of them time also attracted to M-F transexuals).
It takes a careful aligning of "fetishes" in the short version.
INo, I meant serial monogamy is a lack of self love. Serial monogamy is when you just jump from relationship to relationship without any breaks in between for yourself so you could reflect and process after a breakup. That comes off as a lack of self love and dependence issue to meAnd no monogamy is not lack of self-love. That's a feminist lie. That kind of relationship is natural as it's ensure the offsprings are raised healthy to function as civilized rational people.
Yes I understand the biological sex part. But I wanted to ask are you able to love all your partners equally? Or are you just in it for the sex? (which is fine but I'm talking about serious polyamorous relationships)Non-virgin answer:
I'm all for it. Whatevers destroy JC one man/one woman shit.
It does take a lack of possessive jealousy.
It's also wired in our genome to be promiscuous and bisexual. Look at chimps in captivity. There are breeding pairs, yes, but every chimp FUCKS every other chimp, even ones in an existing breeding pair. Dolphins are notoriously sex crazed and bisexual as well. They'll even try to fuck humans.
The unnatural thing was what put the Bacchanalian public sex baths to bed. Many early pagan cultures were ALL polyamorous. Polytheistic = Polyamorous (except in Asia). When the divinity streamlined into a single man the ideas that followed streamlined into JC coveteth patriarchy.
And outside of homosexual polyamorous ones it takes a degree of transgender proclivity of "the odd sex out" to pull off.
E.g. The girl with guys (very rare) has to like wearing a strap-on, and the guy with girls had to like being cockholded and giving oral sex. (Most of the men in question are attracted to the woman's preference for other women over themselves and much of them time also attracted to M-F transexuals).
It takes a careful aligning of "fetishes" in the short version.
You see, they don't get it. I love all the people. Sex is something different.If you're able to love all the people, then why is there a ranking system in polyamorous relationships like primary and secondary etc. I'm not sure if that's a common thing in polyamory. Correct me if I'm wrong
As I get it, not loving other people is a kind of self-hatred. I hope I answered your question on polyamorous relationships.
Mod
And as far as the hierarchy. I don't really think there is any way around that, whether it be subconscious, conscious and unspoken, or obvious with all the bells and whistles. For the most part, it's a matter of convention and unavoidable.
