It does not matter the idea if there a hint of specious logic involved.
Consider this the baseline definition:
"the quality of dealing with ideas rather than events."
I like this /\ definition because it defers to the senses.
I can't draw the universe back before the planck epoch (singularity). There are several plausible (by my infantile human standards) explanations for this. I can sift through theoretical physics Wikipedia's and settle on some bullshit I can only parrot and like best.
Still, when I consider that prequel to the universe it a hazy mesh of not enough information.
In the CERN research they proved the existence of the Higgs-Boson (mass giving god particle) was empirically valid but still didn't answer why there was a massive conversion to kinetic energy, as there were no particle accelerators 13.5 billion years ago.
ALL IDEAS HERE ARE PROTO-CHICKENS OF INFINITE REGRESS.
It's a good place-holder, but certainly not a grounds for a Joan of Arc like conviction.
Agnosticism has been unfairly indoctrinated as "Christian lite" when it's every bit 'anti-theistic' as the scientific mind that demands empirical validation before moving beyond placeholder on an unknown.
** Sorry I don't contribute anything of value here.
