The Human Condition | Forum

Dealing with people?

Cannabis, I suggest cannabis. A strict regiment of medicating constantly with an Indica (or indica dominant hybrid) at or above 20% THC.

Seriously why shed a misanthropic tear for the sheep grazing in the field? Just buy some fucking mint sauce or tzatziki and pita.  That is really all there is to say.

But here's a drift into the occurence of the human condition within different parts of the world.

Human conditions are defined differently by various societies.  I don't mean by country, I mean by belief and its influence on society type. 

The world can be divided into 5 demographic regions of ideas, with one dominant method of transmission. Until the 1990's there was a 6th society type that heavily influenced China, but after its demise it was ultimately absorbed by the west.

The pathogen is spread via meme propagation, or as it is now called in most regions, media.

Ideas spread like contagion and script the normative morality in different ways.  It is the ultrafast "channel" in which these varied ideas spread throughout a Jung-esque collective unconscious specific to a region. While there is some transculturation for the most part each region is uniquely scripted 

In the 'West' American culture is god.  This applies to North and South America, Europe, Austrailia and New Zealand,  S. Korea and Japan. Call that region one.  It is the premiere region because it is the source of most inovation adopted by other regions where transculturation occurs. By default it is satan. The United States invented this region in the 1770's with its founding. 

Region Two is China.  If the western world is Uber, China is Didi Chuxing. Very similar to the west, but state controlled and authoritarian.

Region Three is Muslimlandia.  A salaam alaikum. 

Region four is the Vedic Kingdom. The human condition here is on the tree of Hinduism and its branches such as Buddhism (the Lutherans of the East), Taoism, Sikhism, and all the -isms world weary libtards get into in college.... and subsequently fall into an existenitialist hole with.  

Region Five is Africa.  Half missionary, half warlord. The assured part of the human condition here is corruption and an inability to capitalize on a plethora of natural resources will script a wealth inequality that the world can never match.

No matter where you are, or what slight differences you may have within your sub-region,  you will always be in one of these five society types. 

* Indiginous folk and/or uncontacted tribes are apart from the scope of this. A good rule of thumb is if you still throw sprears at helicopters.

One can conclude the human condition is equally sheepish and the only thing different is the color of the memeplex. 

I don't like people.  

actually I do like people *some of us rather.* but as a species that's different.
we are equally if not more so barbaric as than others.  we are self-destructive, egotistical, self-righteous etc etc ad nauseum.

and as much as I hate it, I am also human. As a human trait, I can't help but care what other humans think. no matter. it's complicated.

And why do you care so much about other people and their condition? Your whining says more about you than them.

At first look, I read "douche." :P

lmao! I am not *usually* that immature. and besides you really  do have a valid point

       Yeah okay OP, some people suck, some don't that's fine and true. Humans aren't all bad, we are war like but we also push forward all the way to the moon. I think that push to do more or understand more may be the other side of the war coin. If we have a universe based on polarity we may not be able to have ambition without violence? ( Just a thought i have no supporting evidence for that) I think the idea of morality may have come from the discovery of what will work in a high functioning society and what traits do not. This of course was later used by governments and religious institutions as forms of social engineering. Hating people for falling for things that are created to be a trap is kind of a waste of time, ya know what I mean?

@Tkwilliams you have a valid point.
@pj my sentiments are as qualified as any...

That was very eloquently stated Plasmotic Jezebel.

What qualifies one to express their sentiments? strange and sophomoric, maybe. Invalid... probably not.

now you may have certifications that I am unaware of that make you an expert on the topic.  In my case, it was just a rant based on my thoughts and feelings at the time.

We seem to have opposing view points and I never professed that my opinions were the only way or the right way.  --just my positions