And This One Time In 2012 | Forum

Chloe Ortega is quite a popular name.

You can find plenty of people under the nym on Facebook. Just type the name in a search box and hundreds of them will come up.

Yeah, I remember the true Chloe pretending to be a fake Chloe aka Jall so that everyone thought it was Jall pretending to be Chloe. That ONA thing is a serious business. You were also quite active in 2013.

BTW, how is my beloved Kerri Scott doing? Did she get get over her menopause moods? Did bedtime sessions with Darryl help?

Thank you for answering my questions random Uncle Tom and Polack.

 This is likely just a bizarre coincidence filtered through a confabulation prone memory.  As 6 years is a lot of time to fuck up your memory of something or someone.  A someone using a very common name, as I have never bothered to search "Chloe Ortega" on the internet. A someone I knew from March - September 2012 with no more connection than that.

Once again thanks to Anna and Albert for taking time to answer my silly question I decided to wait until now to bring up. 

There is just one more thing I forgot to mention.

Her motivation was primarily based on the belief the "real" Chloe was a person of unparalleled evil who needed to be disrupted and perturbed in her evil ambitions. And likewise the evil group she belonged to. 

Did a random go-go-jesus internet search lead to "Dead Pseudomexican" stumbling upon ONA 3.0 and this coincidence? 

I don't know about ONA 3.0 but the random google search led me to your blog
https://doginthemachine.wordpress.com/about/

:)

Weirdly enough, that dude has had the name longer.  I was aware of him when I made the name. He kept in the "ex", but adding 666 to the end of my name seemed more appropriate than proper latin. Point received though.

No worries. You're cooler than him.

As for Chloe, I'm not sure she's a material for an evil character. She's a good writer and that is all that counts online.

@JK

Oh you see. Fuck. I'm doing this again. I will correct myself.

@KJ

Dear sir. I thought you were JK but he has so many ass-lickers that any random troll could impersonate him.

"Folks around here are quick to join the dots."

I noticed you have a somewhat peculiar habit of posting your replies and then deleting them. Why? Is this because you are afraid that some resident idiot from here will call you Chloe's sock or are you simply worrying your style of writing might betray your identity?

"It's sweet to encounter a girl in her age bracket who is a race realist and despises liberals and leftists."

From what I remember she despises Western dumbasses and the decadent pseudo-individualistic Western culture, which in her opinion is inferior to the Asian collective culture.

P.S. She also hopes that with the decline of the American society, enough Whites will get an underpaid job in one of her family businesses or will clean her shoes as her personal servants.

Oh dear. I've had cats for years and none has ever tripped me up. I'm really sorry for your unpleasant experience. Perhaps, like AK, you should try dogs.

Now seriously, your trololol race argument doesn't have any merit. Because you see... Chloe is s fucking Asian. If she's as pretty and smart as you claim, then that defeats not supports your argument. Perhaps, the liberals and leftists are right and we should let in more immigrants and let them develop their inner potential. Some of them could turn out to be as precious as your Chloe. :-)

And what side of the moon are you living on?

The "race realists" here are white supremacists. It's an euphemism.

 We can have a semantic hair splitting but the political reality in the West is obvious.

If it weren't for "libtards" and their ideology, Ms Chloe's family wouldn't be admitted to the US.

Or perhaps, together with other immigrants she would be subjected to "peaceful ethnic cleansing" i.e., gently asked to leave.

You remind me of those Polish fools who worship Hitler. It always amused me.

Excuse me?

So racialism is now caring for your people? Isn't it by any chance a scientific or rather pseudoscientific theory debunked by modern genetics?
If hypothetically, your or my family keep mixing with people of different races, no racialist genius will figure out what race our descendants belong to.

@Anna: I've only read your post above so... with that said...

Race, sports team, favorite band... it doesn't matter. People group up citing any given commonality as the justification.  It's not a matter of genetics, but social psychology.

"In sociology and social psychology, an ingroup is a social group to which a person psychologically identifies as being a member. By contrast, an outgroup is a social group with which an individual does not identify. For example, people may find it psychologically meaningful to view themselves according to their race, culture, gender, age, or religion. It has been found that the psychological membership of social groups and categories is associated with a wide variety of phenomena."

Well, the race IS biological but the question is whether it is more significant than say a hair color. Many people forget that the Jews and Palestinian Arabs belong to the same semitic race. What builds a community is not a race but a common culture. The race is meaningless.

LOL, NM. I just realized I'm so off topic it's retarded. 

Note to self: read whole thread.