I remember times when I had hit on some from that beginning intrigue as a younger teenager and boy I got yelled at for "fetishism of trans" and I react "what? I am just attracted and trying to flirt...", some have actually been quite okay with the attraction and are flattered by it, more so, noticing of their ability to pass! Really, I love trans women that are very chill like that and understand some of us "Cis males" like them. I know they are one thing I adore and Satan bless their great existence! Hail Satan! :)
We are nothing but beasts. Plenty of other beasts commit acts of homosexuality - and these beasts follow the Laws of Nature even closer than we humans do. Are the animals such as sheep, bonobos, and dolphins better Satanists than we are?Yes, it's gay. Especially if the shemale has a dick and balls. That's a man, and when you're a man and you have sex with a person with a dick and pair of balls also, you are a homosexual. Plain and simple.
Being gay goes against the Laws of Nature, and therefore it is unsatanic. Satan hates fags.
The truth hurts.
We are nothing but beasts. Plenty of other beasts commit acts of homosexuality - and these beasts follow the Laws of Nature even closer than we humans do. Are the animals such as sheep, bonobos, and dolphins better Satanists than we are?Yes, it's gay. Especially if the shemale has a dick and balls. That's a man, and when you're a man and you have sex with a person with a dick and pair of balls also, you are a homosexual. Plain and simple.
Being gay goes against the Laws of Nature, and therefore it is unsatanic. Satan hates fags.
The truth hurts.
There are hypotheses that homosexuality in nature is a form of self-enforced population-control, however I'm unsure to the credit to those thoughts.
So, I would say it's much more natural than us sitting here, talking through the Internet.
@ SatanicBrain, Animals do not commit acts of Homosexuality. They commit acts of Dominance. Mother natures law is tooth and claw. It is survival of the fittest. You sir have never been an Alpha or you would fully understand this. It is NOT natural at all. Then again it is not natural for people sitting behind a PC wanting to have conversations with strangers instead of face to face, like I am doing right now.. If you want to be Homosexual that is your choice and I am not going to deny you happiness if you can find it. But do not give me such BS as that. Homosexuals do not reproduce, there for their kind becomes extinct in one generation if they were created by nature.
This is a warning. I do not care if you hate liberals and homosexuals. Nor does anyone here. But, not cool to call homosexuals idiots, stupid ect. Satanism if you have read the Satanic Bible accepts ' consensual sex between two adults' . So, for you to say homosexuality is un satanic and 'Satan hates fags' you just sound ignorant.I hate fags.
The thing about you faggots and supporters of faggism is that you are Liberals. I hate fucking Liberals: you have no sense of Conservatism/preservationism, meaning the preservation of your folk/people's traditions, culture, customs, religion, etc.
You faggots believe you have the liberty to do whatever the fuck you want. To the detriment of your social order, traditions, culture, customs, ancestral religions.
That's why you faggots are fucking stupid. In this regard, its a good thing that you faggots don't reproduce!
Fucking Liberals. You faggots probably have niggers as friends and think multiculturalism is good, and dislike racism.
Stupid fucks.
If you continue in this manner you will be removed.
Nature by definition equals anything that has come into existence without any influence from mankind... so how exactly do you get to someone not being natural? When kids grow up they know that they feel different to how most of society acts, and it is only due to social expectations that they are made aware, from that point onwards, even if they do not have a label to fit (also a mankind thing, as nature sure as Hell doesn't label everything) Then they might talk to a parent and then a few things can happen; Parent rejects child (due to social construct rather than parenting). Parent enrolls kid into some kind of fucked up Xtian ritual to Cure Homosexual tendencies or Parent knows how to parent well, and ensures their kids that we are what we are, it's all good.
As for Transexuals it is proven that the brain is different; men having a female brain and women a male one. As most already know, our sexuality is driven by hormones/chemicals from the many glands in our body; no one chooses to be gay or lesbian or transgendered, they are simply born the same as anyone else; nature made us all.
As for the original posters question, irrelevant of the body assigned at birth, a man is a man and a woman is a woman by their own standard of the words definition; Old English wifmon (a mans wife) and wer and wif were used to name male and female humans respectively, Man was used as in all humans, no sexual preference. So as far as I can tell, it is upto the individual as to their sexual choices, and nothing at all to do with genitalia. Actually all that the genitals are for is reproduction, as is the case for all animals; and has nothing at all to do with the change of chemicals in the brain when emotions such as happiness, contentment, attraction or pleasure, etc... If you like, fancy or are interested in someone and they make you feel good, then who fucking cares what their genitals look like, we are not defined by our body when the mind is so much more.
Fancy whoever you want, got fuck all to do with anyone else.
So some of you are homophobes, I get that, each to their own, I am Morophobic... but as for saying that homoseuality is not Natural, what planet of natural do you live on? Do some of you even know what natural means? Know what you are talking about before you speak.Morophobia....I am going to use this word now, I am going to get triggered and claim they are aggravating my morophobia every time someone says something stupid.
I don't think it's gay. I don't think it's straight either. I don't even know if there's a label for it, but Satanism says it's all good as long as you're both consenting, so who cares?
Seek out your pleasures.
Your friend,
Dio.
Zoramonkey your a racist bitch im African american dip shit your not even a real satanist cause if you were you'll know that lord satan is not racist in that he loves each in every one of us cause we are the children of his seed. You dont belive hes real you got a whole lot to catch up on so stop being a bitch cause lord satan is the god of darkness in when you racist bitch call us black think abt Father Satan whos the god of darkness so he used that dark to make us black people not you goofy ass white people cause that bitch up above is creater of supposedly light in to let you know father satan is as real as it gets so stop being a bitch cause racism is so over withZoramonkey didn't say those things. It was another user that I assumed got removed.
For some it's not the female that attracts them, but the female form.I think you nailed the head on it with the idea of being attracted to the female form.I don't think it's gay. I don't think it's straight either. I don't even know if there's a label for it, but Satanism says it's all good as long as you're both consenting, so who cares?
Seek out your pleasures.
Your friend,
Dio.
As for a term for it, I think that's where pansexuality comes into place, where you are attracted without limitation of sex, gender, or gender identity. Of course, that's not to say all pansexuals are attracted to all things, but that pansexuals may be attracted outside the normal confines of homo/heterosexuality.
Unless in the midst of actually having sex, everyone is asexual. It doesn't matter what you're aroused by, it's what you're doing.
If you happen to find yourself fucking a dude that thinks he's a chick, and you are also a dude, then yes! In the moments that you are doing that, that is "gay".
There's a lot more important things about me than what I have sex with; even if I only have sex with women.
*also, yes, a trans female is still a male. 'Will always be. A dude that went through great lengths to pass as a chick, is still a dude. And if one is humping said dude-who-went-through-great-lengths-to-pass-as-a-chick. That is gay. "Thinking" about having sex with them doesn't mean or change anything.
I don't think much of this is sjw talk to be honest, I don't think trans are their born gender in the soul nor do I know for sure what they are but I am keeping open minded to the science of trans people. Really what we should be worried about is just being closed minded to something we do not understand and this type of mindset; being an open mind to things I do not understand has given me a fair share of hate from people like those at storm front and similar. Maybe that is sjw talk right there but I know damn well like the sjw community, so had others in being polluted in the minds for mindlessly following and not trying to think about something.
You can think of yourself however you like. I'm just saying: one is only what they are doing at the time. If you think the D might pleasure you - it probably might! It will neither make nor change who you are, though.I think the reason your pal and several people agonize over this subject is because gender and sexual orientation tend to define culture, dominance hierarchy rank, sexual marketplace value, financial and domestic options...especially those concerning child rearing and dominant culture.
In my (not so) humble opinion, you are agonizing over a triviality.
It is strange that gay and strait cultures are still distinct despite many crossovers. This becomes more evident if you were able to jump from one racial or ideological/religious culture. This is also wrought with crossovers in situations like the odd Anglo/Asian cultural bridge and everyone in the occult subculture has most of their roots and life in the larger dominant cultures. Finding out you are gay is like waking up Hispanic after years of being Anglo.
I can get a little salty in this discussion simply because sure there are only two biological genders but the narrow conventional templates for behavior might work for some of you but there are many of us who have a bit more range get really tired of those who prefer convention insisting on being rude.
I remember Ron playing a song that made fun of Paganism and the occult, saying it was "just made up" the asshole who sung the song probably sung that with smug satisfaction. Safe in the knowledge that the Christianity or Judaism they practiced surely was not made up like that. Really. Never mind the recent archeological findings like the Flavian thing, Never mind that all the Abrahamics say their books are "the word of gawd" even though all of said books say in the very texts they hold that they too were "made up" Basically you have a larger conventional group that just can't leave well enough alone and needs to shit on the outsiders at any point.
This may sound like sjw talk but really the sjws embrace the greater but still minority conventional cultures like gay and feminist culture. The outsiders still seem to be the brunt of such fashionable rudeness. So yea, refer to a trans woman as male, sure it is biologically valid but it is also rude and a dick move, and please, those of you who wish to do this, please, do not lie to everyone and possibly yourself that you do not give a fuck because you are not here to make friends.
This is a social media site. Go back to Stormfront if you wish to be selectively rude to people on this site because of something about them that does not effect you. Apologies if this sounds salty.
Are we really a meat sack? There is a scientific term for the soul called the life force which that bio electricity comes from the brain through out the body. Lavey is indeed a smart man and a credited satanist where it is deserved but I don't think that all he says is the arbiter of truth personally.
Lastly, I ask one consider this: what I think LaVey was driving-at was that the fleshly, the carnal, the meat-sack that is you, is all there is to you. There is no soul. Subsequently, whenever in doubt - even if it is as to something as basic as their own gender - one is what they were born with. As-in "born, not made" A is A. etc.
I see this commonly that people will believe that all trans must cut off born genitalia, really that is their personal choice if they wanna keep it or not which that seems like something you understand and I understand people naturally have some reactions. Generally the only reactions I just do not like is just cold minded and continuous, maybe you can laugh and wonder why someone would do what they do, people that comes to mind being of the storm front is someone who can sit down and relentlessly give you alot of ad hominems, tell you how a man and woman should be, what sexuality are by no means acceptable (giving long lectures how it is degenerate), etc... all of this decorum restricting people from being who they are as an individual! People like that is who I am rather against, not someone who gives some funny looks and has just verbal opinions that is not big enough to feel like an attack/infringement on someone else.
And yes, if someone is willing to get their own dick or tits chopped-off and mangled with scalpels, they should probably expect, at the very least, more than few raised eyebrows - but it's not so much on them for doing it, it's on them for making said (f'n crazy!) decision an open-item for discussion to anyone within ear-shot.
This is a warning. I do not care if you hate liberals and homosexuals. Nor does anyone here. But, not cool to call homosexuals idiots, stupid ect. Satanism if you have read the Satanic Bible accepts ' consensual sex between two adults' . So, for you to say homosexuality is un satanic and 'Satan hates fags' you just sound ignorant.
If you continue in this manner you will be removed.
You heard it here, folks. The good book says what the good book says, I'm here to cite the word and lay down its authority. Here, we all defer to that.